GAZETTE

Posted on by

Law Gazette of Public Law No. 63

Posted on by

Case Law Gazette of Public Law No 63, week from July 29 to August 2, 2019. This week we can highlight the sentence of the Supreme Court in which it states: The article 53 of the Law No 19.880 is not a remedy, said article give to the Administration the faculty to invalidate, ex officio or by request, the acts that are unlawful. The law has not provided means to object against the resolution that decide not to use said faculty

Law Gazette of Public Law No. 62

Posted on by

Case Law Gazette of Public Law No 62, week from July 22 to 28, 2019. This week we can highlight the sentence of the Supreme Court in which it states: The denial of the application for transfer of alcohol patent, by the Municipal Council, founded in vague, uncertain, subjective and impossible to verify antecedents, such as information that the Councilors had obtained “by other sides” that there was a clandestine sale of alcohol, constitutes a lack of service.

Law Gazette of Public Law No. 59

Posted on by

Case Law Gazette of Public Law No 59, week from July 1 to 7, 2019. This week we can highlight the sentence of the Supreme Court in which it states: The links between a natural person and a Municipality can be qualified as work relations, subject to the Work Code, if they develop outside the legal frame of the article 4 of the Law No 18.883, that establish the contracting on the base of fees, as long as the relations comply with the requirements of habituality, permanence, subordination and dependence established by the work legislator.

Law Gazette of Public Law No. 58

Posted on by

Case Law Gazette of Public Law No 58, week from June 24 to 30, 2019. This week we can highlight the sentence of the Supreme Court in which it states: The joint use or not of a same enclosure can not determinate the prohibition of the development of two licit activities and whose functions are expressly recognized on the legal system. Like, on one side, the activity of reception and delivery of prescriptions of lenses with dioptric force, and, on the other hand, the evaluation of ocular refraction vices and the prescription of corrective optical lenses. Said legal difference lacks any rational justification.
In this way, the article 126, paragraph second of the Health Code infringe the article 19 No 2, paragraph second of the Constitution.

Law Gazette of Public Law No. 57

Posted on by

Case Law Gazette of Public Law No 57, week from June 17 to 23, 2019. This week we can highlight the sentence of the Supreme Court in which it states: In the context of a lawsuit about patrimonial responsibility of the State, the right interpretation of the prescription rules is the one that understand that the civil interruption of the extinctive prescription period happens with the judicial notification of the lawsuit, effected in a legal manner, said action prevents that the term in question is completed

Law Gazette of Public Law No. 56

Posted on by

LCase Law Gazette of Public Law No 56, week from June 10 to 16, 2019. This week we can highlight the sentence of the Supreme Court in which it states: The article 15 of the Law No 19.287, which establish that the lists of past-due debtors for the obligations of said law will be public, does not allowed to make an inopportune collection of the Solidary Fund. In the mention case, the debt publication vulnerates the property right of the debtor, by preventing her to access to funding sources in equal terms that other persons.